Product evaluated: Logitech G PRO X Superlight 2 DEX Wireless Gaming Mouse, 60g pro-Grade Right-Handed Mouse with 5 programmable Buttons, USB-C Charging, 44k DPI Sensor, up to 8 kHz Polling for PC/Mac - Black
Related Videos For You
Logitech G PRO Wireless BEST WIRELESS GAMING MOUSE Unboxing and Complete Setup
Wireless Mouse Not Working Problem Fix100%#macnitesh#wireless#mouse
Data set Hundreds of buyer comments and product feedback were reviewed between Sep 2024 and Feb 2026, mixing written reviews and video demonstrations.
| Comparison | PRO X Superlight 2 | Typical mid-range mouse |
|---|---|---|
| Connection reliability | Higher risk of intermittent wireless drops during active sessions as commonly reported. | Moderate reliability usually suits long gaming sessions without frequent drops. |
| Battery reality | Variable battery performance that often needs more frequent charging than advertised. | Predictable battery life with steady decline after months, typical for this price tier. |
| Setup friction | Hidden requirement to use software for core tuning creates extra steps for many buyers. | Simpler plug-and-play setups are common for mid-range alternatives. |
| Durability during use | Mixed reports of button or feet wear that can appear with heavy, daily use. | More forgiving build quality is common at this price point. |
| Regret trigger | Wireless drops during competitive play are the primary regret trigger buyers report. | Minor annoyances but fewer session-ending issues for typical mid-range options. |
Is the wireless connection unreliable during play?

Regret moment Many buyers describe sudden cursor freezes or stutters during gaming sessions, which interrupt play and cost aim.
Pattern This issue is commonly reported and appears most often during intense gaming or when the receiver is tucked behind a laptop.
Why worse Buyers expect continuous connection from a premium-branded mouse, so drops feel more disruptive than the occasional lag found in mid-range models.
Will battery life fall short in daily use?

- Early sign Battery drains faster than the packaging suggests after active daily sessions.
- Frequency tier This is a secondary issue that appears across many recent owner reports.
- When it shows The decline is most visible after weeks of heavy gaming and prolonged high-polling settings.
- Impact The result forces extra charging breaks, which hurts long play or travel.
Does software add unwelcome setup steps?

- Core problem Advanced features require installing the vendor software to get claimed performance.
- Usage anchor This shows up at first setup and whenever firmware updates arrive.
- Hidden requirement People report discovering essential settings only in the software, not on the device.
- Cause Reliance on software makes the mouse less plug-and-play than many buyers assume.
- Attempts Users try firmware reinstalls or driver resets to restore expected behavior.
- Category contrast This adds more setup time than typical mid-range mice, which often work well without extra software.
Are buttons, feet, or scroll inconsistent or fragile?

- Early sign Side-buttons feel loose or require extra presses after months of daily use.
- Frequency tier This is a secondary but persistent complaint among heavier users.
- When it worsens Issues emerge with frequent gripping, long sessions, and repeated travel.
- Cause Mechanical wear and tracking of feet can degrade glide and click crispness.
- Impact Users see reduced accuracy and tactile response, which hurts competitive play.
- Attempts People replace feet, swap buttons, or seek warranty help to recover performance.
- Fixability Repairs or part swaps add cost and time, making this worse than typical category wear.
Illustrative excerpts

Excerpt “Cursor froze mid-match, then came back after a second.” — primary pattern
Excerpt “Battery lasted less than expected after heavy weekend use.” — secondary pattern
Excerpt “Had to install software to access settings; surprised this was required.” — primary pattern
Excerpt “Side button started double-clicking after months of daily play.” — secondary pattern
Who should avoid this

- Competitive players who cannot tolerate unexpected wireless drops during matches.
- Frequent travelers who need a no-fuss plug-and-play mouse without software reliance.
- Users on tight budgets who would regret repair or replacement costs if hardware issues appear.
Who this is actually good for

- Brand-loyal enthusiasts who accept occasional setup work to get premium features.
- Casual gamers who can tolerate extra charging and rare stutters during non-competitive play.
- Customizers who plan to use official software and are comfortable troubleshooting firmware.
Expectation vs reality

Expectation Reasonable for this category: buyers expect long battery life for a lightweight wireless mouse.
Reality Battery life is less reliable in heavy use, requiring more frequent charging than expected.
Expectation Reasonable for this category: premium brand equals stable wireless performance.
Reality Connection drops are more disruptive than typical mid-range mice and can end sessions.
Safer alternatives

- Pick lower polling Choose a mouse with configurable polling rates to reduce wireless stress and preserve battery.
- Look for plug-and-play Prioritize models that work well without vendor software to avoid hidden setup steps.
- Check warranty Favor sellers with easy RMA or clear replacement policies to limit downtime from hardware wear.
- Read durability reports Seek reviews focusing on months-long use for button and feet longevity.
The bottom line

Main trigger The primary regret is wireless drops during active play, which buyers report often enough to matter.
Why worse This issue exceeds normal category risk because it interrupts matches and needs software or fixes to mitigate.
Verdict Avoid this mouse if you need rock-steady wireless performance for competitive or travel-heavy use.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

