Logitech G923 Steering Jerk, Noise & Setup Issues Review

Data basis: I analyzed dozens of buyer reports and video demonstrations collected from launch through Jan 2026, with most feedback from written reviews and supported by several setup videos.

?Why does the steering feel jerky or clipped in races?

Regret moment: Jerks or sudden cutoffs in force feedback appear during driving, making steering unpredictable in corners.

Pattern: This is a commonly reported issue, not universal but frequent enough to disrupt play sessions.

When it happens: It usually appears during game-driven force events or after long play sessions when feedback is most active.

Category contrast: Most mid-range wheels give smoother feedback, so this feels more disruptive than buyers expect at this price.

?How often will setup and calibration steal time from driving?

• Early signs: Repeated calibration prompts and inconsistent steering centering during first use are commonly reported.
• Frequency tier: This is a primary issue for many buyers and appears during initial setup and after firmware updates.
• Cause: The problem often ties to software integration and firmware interplay with games and consoles.
• Impact: It adds extra setup steps and interrupts play, making the wheel feel high-maintenance compared with peers.
• Fixability: Temporary fixes exist, but many buyers must repeat them after updates or game changes.

?Will I hear grinding or notice mechanical wear during long sessions?

• Noise reports: Some buyers commonly report grinding or clicking noises that develop with repeated use.
• When it worsens: Noise tends to increase during long sessions or aggressive force feedback moments.
• Scope: This is a secondary issue—less frequent than setup problems but more annoying over time.
• Hidden requirement: Expect occasional disassembly or service steps for persistent noises, a requirement many buyers did not anticipate.
• Impact on longevity: Noise often signals internal wear that shortens comfortable use compared with quieter alternatives.
• Attempted fixes: Buyers report cleaning, re-torquing mounts, and contacting support with mixed outcomes.

?Does the wheel need extra software or firmware to behave properly?

• Software dependence: The wheel often requires the manufacturer's hub software and firmware updates to function as expected.
• Usage anchor: This shows up at first use and resurfaces after major OS or game updates.
• Why worse than normal: Many mid-range wheels work fine plug-and-play, so repeated software steps feel like added friction here.
• Frequency tier: This is a primary complaint across buyer reports and setup videos.
• Cause: Conflicts between the hub software, firmware versions, and specific game support cause inconsistent results.
• Impact on consoles: Console users often need extra steps or adapters to maintain stable behavior.
• Support outcomes: When fixes fail, buyers sometimes need returns or repairs, which adds time and hassle.
• Hidden cost: The ongoing setup time and troubleshooting are more than typical for mid-range wheels.

Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)

"Wheel cut out mid-race, had to restart the game twice." — reflects a primary pattern disrupting sessions.

"Had to update firmware three times to stop wobble." — reflects a secondary pattern tied to setup friction.

"Started making grinding noise after two months of heavy use." — reflects a secondary wear pattern.

"Works fine for short practice, fails on endurance races." — reflects an edge-case tied to long sessions.

Who should avoid this

• Competitive racers who need rock-solid force feedback for race consistency should avoid this due to jerks and calibration risk.
• Plug-and-play buyers who dislike repeated setup steps should avoid this model because it often needs software maintenance.
• Silent-cockpit users who prioritize low noise should avoid this wheel when planning long sessions, due to reported grinding.

Who this is actually good for

• Tinkerers who accept firmware updates and software fixes will tolerate setup friction for strong feature set.
• Casual players who play short sessions can accept occasional jerks and noise without major frustration.
• Brand-loyal buyers who value integrated features over flawless reliability may accept higher maintenance.

Expectation vs reality

Expectation (reasonable): Buyers expect a mid-range wheel to require occasional calibration.

Reality: The G923 commonly needs repeated firmware, software, and re-calibration steps far more often than typical alternatives.

Expectation: Force feedback should feel smooth in supported games.

Reality: Many users experience jerks or clipping during intense feedback moments, which harms control and enjoyment.

Safer alternatives

• Choose lower setup risk: Look for wheels advertised as plug-and-play or with fewer firmware updates to avoid repeated calibration.
• Prioritize quiet operation: Seek user feedback emphasizing low noise and long-session stability to neutralize grinding concerns.
• Avoid heavy software dependence: Favor models with confirmed compatibility for your console or PC without mandatory hub software.
• Check support and warranty clarity: Pick brands with straightforward replacement or service paths to reduce repair downtime.

The bottom line

Main regret trigger: Repeated force-feedback glitches and setup friction create ongoing maintenance for owners.

Why it matters: These issues exceed normal mid-range risk because they interrupt play and can signal mechanical wear.

Verdict: Avoid this wheel if you want low-maintenance, quiet, and consistently smooth feedback for serious racing.