Product evaluated: INJORA IR60-24 Pickup Hard Body Shell with Bed Rack for 1/24 RC Crawler Axial SCX24 C10 Bronco Wrangler Base Camp 4Runner(Green)
Related Videos For You
SCX10 Magnetic Body Mounts - How To Video
A Seriously Scale 1/24 Model to RC Crawler Conversion 🏁 Full Build and Test Drive
Data basis: This report is based on dozens of buyer comments and video demonstrations collected between January 2024 and January 2026. Most feedback came from written reviews, supported by hands-on footage and installation clips. Source mix skews to recent buyers.
| Buyer outcome | INJORA IR60-24 | Typical mid-range body |
|---|---|---|
| Fit & compatibility | Frequent fit doubts; requires stock chassis or extra parts. | Usually fits common 1/24 chassis without extra purchases. |
| Installation time | Often longer because of alignment and custom mounting steps. | Typical mid-range shells install in a single quick session. |
| Access for battery/servos | Mixed reports; hinge design helps but magnets may not fit all frames. | Reliable access features across chassis variants. |
| Durability | Variable paint and thin tabs lead to more repairs than expected. | More durable shells resist chips and cracking under normal use. |
| Regret trigger | Hidden compatibility requirement makes replacement or retrofit likely. | Low regret when replacing stock body. |
Will this body shell actually fit my chassis?
Regret moment: Buyers discover fit problems during first test fit, not at checkout. Severity: stops use until extra parts are sourced.
Pattern: this is a primary issue and appears repeatedly across recent feedback. When: shows up at first use or during first mounting attempts. Category contrast: more disruptive than typical mid-range shells because many alternatives accept minor trimming instead of full extra parts.
Does mounting and access create extra work?
- Early sign: body misalignment on initial screws, which increases install time.
- Frequency tier: secondary issue; commonly reported but not universal.
- Cause: narrow wheelbase and chassis-specific mounting points require careful adjustment.
- Impact: adds extra steps and time compared with most mid-range shells.
- Fixability: often fixed with trimming or aftermarket mounts, which means extra cost and effort.
Is the finish and durability fragile in regular use?
- Early sign: paint scuffs and edge chips after light use or first run.
- Pattern: secondary complaint seen across written feedback and video demonstrations.
- When: appears during initial trail sessions and worsens with repeated handling.
- Cause: thin lacquer and tight mounting points that rub or flex under stress.
- Impact: cosmetic damage is more visible than buyers expect for this price tier.
- Attempts: some owners sand and repaint, adding time and cost.
- Category contrast: this is less forgiving than typical mid-range bodies which hold finish better out of box.
Are hidden parts or mounts required?
- Hidden requirement: magnetic mount only fits stock chassis and is not universal.
- Pattern: primary issue; repeatedly pointed out by buyers who used alternate chassis.
- When: discovered after purchase when trying to attach the magnetic mount to non-stock frames.
- Impact: forces additional purchases such as specific magnetic mounts or LCG adapters.
- Attempts: buyers either modify the chassis or buy separate mounts to make it work.
- Scope: this affects users with popular aftermarket chassis options more than stock-owners.
- Category contrast: more hidden hardware needs than typical parts in this class, which usually list universal mounts.
- Fixability: solvable but requires shopping and mechanical skill, which many casual buyers did not expect.
Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)

Illustrative: "Haven't used it yet; doesn't line up with my LCG chassis mount." Pattern: primary issue.
Illustrative: "Small paint chips after first run along rear rack edges." Pattern: secondary issue.
Illustrative: "Magnet didn't hold; had to buy adapter to secure body." Pattern: primary issue.
Illustrative: "Screws are tiny and strip easily if over-tightened." Pattern: edge-case issue.
Who should avoid this

- Owners of aftermarket chassis: avoid if you use LCG or non-stock frames due to hidden mount incompatibility.
- Buyers wanting plug-and-play fit: avoid if you expect quick installation without modifications.
- Those valuing factory finish: avoid if visible paint durability matters, since chips appear early in use.
Who this is actually good for

- Stock SCX24 owners: this suits buyers with the original chassis who accept the magnetic mount design.
- Hobbyists who mod parts: good for tinkerers who plan to trim or adapt mounts and repaint as needed.
- Budget-focused builders: okay for those who accept extra setup time to save on initial cost.
Expectation vs reality

Expectation: reasonable for this category to require minor trimming for fit. Reality: this product often needs specific mounts or replacements, which is more work than typical.
Expectation: mid-range bodies usually hold paint through a few runs. Reality: buyers report visible chips after the first sessions.
Safer alternatives

- Choose universal-fit shells: look for bodies advertised as compatible with multiple 1/24 chassis to avoid hidden mounts.
- Prefer reinforced tabs: pick shells that highlight stronger attachment points to reduce cracking and flex.
- Check access design: select shells with documented battery/servo access for your specific chassis to avoid custom hinges.
- Buy from vendors with support: favor sellers who list alternative mount parts or provide installation guides.
The bottom line

Main regret: hidden compatibility and fit problems are the most common triggers for buyer frustration. Why worse: these issues force extra purchases or hands-on fixes, exceeding normal category inconvenience. Verdict: avoid if you need a plug-and-play replacement body.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

