Roxy Rising High Ski Pant Fit & Wear Issues Review

Data basis: This report synthesizes findings from dozens of written reviews and video demonstrations collected between Jan 2024 and Feb 2026. Most feedback came from written reviews, supported by videos, with a smaller portion from Q&A and photo uploads.

Top failures

Why does the fit cause immediate frustration on the slopes?

Regret moment: Buyers complain the skinny fit feels too tight at first wear, limiting movement during runs.

Pattern signal: This is a primary issue that appears repeatedly across reviews, not universal but common.

Usage anchor: The tightness shows up at first use, and worsens when adding base layers or during long ski sessions.

Category contrast: Fit problems are expected in ski pants, but this one is less forgiving than most mid-range options because the cut leaves little extra room.

Are leaks and seam failures common during wet days?

• Early sign: Water pooling at ankles or damp inner lining after a half-day on wet snow.
• Frequency tier: This is a secondary issue that appears repeatedly, especially in extended, wet conditions.
• Cause clue: Problems often start at reinforced seams and hems under repeated flex.
• Impact: Users report losing warmth and needing to change layers mid-day.
• Attempts: Short-term fixes include seam tape or reproofing sprays, which are commonly tried.
• Fixability: Repairs or aftermarket waterproofing restore protection but add effort and cost.

Will these pants hold up across seasons or show wear fast?

• Visible wear: Fraying at cuffs and threads pulling near zippered pockets appear after regular use.
• Scope signal: This is a secondary pattern seen across photo uploads and written comments.
• When it worsens: Wear accelerates with frequent skiing, boot scuffs, and machine washing.
• Category contrast: Ski pants usually last multiple seasons; here durability seems shorter-lived than the mid-range baseline.

Does the price hide any extra setup or tailoring needs?

• Hidden requirement: Buyers often must size up for layering then tailor the waist for a good fit.
• Frequency tier: This is a primary regret for buyers who wear base layers or need a full range of motion.
• Time cost: Alterations or returns add extra steps and delay before a usable garment.
• Value impact: At the listed price, these extra costs make the pant less cost-effective than similar options.
• Workaround: Some buyers accept the tight look for fashion but lose comfort during long days.
• Warranty note: Repairs are possible, but service time and shipping add friction.
• Category contrast: Most mid-range pants do not force tailoring to be functional, making this a higher-than-normal burden.

Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)

"Too tight over base layers, restricted when I tried to carve turns." — reflects a primary pattern.

"Rainy day soaked through at the seams after a short hike." — reflects a secondary pattern.

"Cuff thread pulled out after two machine washes." — reflects a secondary pattern.

"Had to size up and get waist altered, adds extra cost and time." — reflects a primary pattern.

Who should avoid this

• Tight-fit seekers: Avoid if you need roomy layering or full mobility, since the skinny cut restricts movement.
• Wet-condition riders: Avoid if you spend long days in heavy wet snow, because seam leaks are commonly reported.
• Low-maintenance buyers: Avoid if you want a plug-and-play pant; expected repairs and tailoring add time and cost.

Who this is actually good for

• Style-first skiers: Good if you prioritize a slim, fashionable look and accept limited mobility for short sessions.
• Occasional riders: Works for weekend use where heavy exposure and frequent washing are unlikely.
• DIY repairers: Suitable if you are comfortable applying seam tape or reproofing products to extend life.

Expectation vs reality

Expectation: Reasonable for this category is a reliable, true-to-size ski pant that keeps you dry during all-day runs.

Reality: Buyers commonly find a tight fit and intermittent leaks that reduce usefulness in prolonged or wet conditions.

Expectation: Paying a premium usually brings longer durability and fewer alterations.

Reality: Here the premium price is met by an increased need for alterations and early repairs, which hurts value.

Safer alternatives

• Choose roomier cuts: Prioritize pants labeled regular or relaxed fit if you plan to layer heavily.
• Seek proven waterproofing: Look for pants with long-term seam-sealed warranties or tested waterproof ratings to avoid leaks.
• Check durability details: Prefer reinforced cuffs and double-stitched seams for multi-season use.
• Try before you buy: If possible, try layering at purchase to test mobility and sizing with base layers.

The bottom line

Main regret trigger: Combined fit and wear issues produce the strongest buyer dissatisfaction.

Why it matters: These problems occur early or after limited use, making them more disruptive than typical ski pant complaints.

Verdict: Avoid this pant if you need reliable fit, long wet-weather protection, or season-long durability without extra alterations.