Product evaluated: Vlogging Kit for iPhone/Android, 63”Auto Face Tracking Tripod for iPhone with Light, Wireless Microphones, Scrolling Remote Control for TikTok, Content Creator Kit for YouTube Starter
Related Videos For You
Best CHEAP Vlogging Setup? Rode Vlogger Kit Review
Auto Face Tracking Tripod Review | Remote, 360° Rotation Auto Tracking Phone Holder No App
Data basis: This report synthesizes feedback from dozens of written reviews and video demonstrations collected between Jan 2024 and Jan 2026. Most feedback came from written reviews, supported by video demos, with a smaller share of Q&A notes and product replies.
| Outcome | This kit | Typical mid-range kit |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking reliability | Unreliable — commonly reported loss of lock during movement, worse than peers. | Mostly stable — mid-range alternatives usually hold center for basic movement. |
| Audio & connectivity | Flaky — pairing and range issues appear repeatedly during use. | Reliable — typical kits offer steadier wireless links or wired backups. |
| Build & stability | Wobbly — base and extension feel less forgiving under long extension. | More stable — mid-range tripods usually have heavier, more secure bases. |
| Lighting & remote | Inconsistent — light warmth and remote responses reported as irregular. | Predictable — comparable kits give steadier light and remotes. |
| Regret trigger | Primary — face-tracking loss combined with mic dropouts causes unusable footage. | Lower risk — mid-range kits rarely fail both tracking and audio together. |
Why does the face-tracking lose me while I move?
Primary issue: the face-tracking often loses subjects during normal movement and recent setup steps.
Context signal: this happens during setup and when walking or turning quickly, and it re-centers slowly in most reports.
Category contrast line: this is more disruptive than typical mid-range tripods because both tracking and recovery are inconsistent, turning short takes into unusable clips.
How stable is the microphone and wireless link?
- Mic dropout — commonly reported during interviews or when moving away from the receiver.
- Pairing quirks — many users see pairing fail on first setup or after sleep, a persistent pattern.
- Battery limits — mics charge fast but users report the runtime falling with daily use.
- Compatibility — receiver wiring needs correct Lightning or Type-C selection, a hidden connector requirement.
- Fix attempts — resets and re-pairing sometimes restore audio, but problems often return during long sessions.
Will the tripod and mount stay steady while extended?
- Extension wobble — stability worsens when extended near its 63-inch claim, seen repeatedly in demos.
- Base weakness — the four-leg base can shift on uneven floors and under outdoor breezes.
- Phone fit — the holder supports 4"–4.7" devices, which excludes larger phones without adapters.
- Rotation play — the 360° rotation feels loose for multi-angle pans during handheld movement.
- Setup sensitivity — correct tightening is required each session, else tilt drift appears quickly.
- Category gap — more upkeep and fiddling than most mid-range alternatives, causing time loss before recording.
Why do the lights and remote sometimes fail to behave?
- Light inconsistency — brightness and warmth modes reported as uneven across the two included lights.
- Remote lag — the scrolling/remote functions occasionally miss presses, a recurring complaint.
- Range shortfall — remote advertised range feels optimistic for long-room setups in multiple reports.
- Charging mix — the kit includes Type-C and Lightning options, creating a hidden cable and adapter dependency.
- App-free but manual — some features need manual button sequences after setup, a usability surprise.
- Repair friction — fixes often require repeated resets rather than one clear solution.
- Edge-case — cold or crowded wireless environments make the remote and lights misbehave more often.
Illustrative excerpts

Illustrative excerpt: "Tracking dropped while I walked and ruined a whole short clip." — reflects a primary pattern.
Illustrative excerpt: "Mic paired then cut out at the worst moment during an interview." — reflects a secondary pattern.
Illustrative excerpt: "Needed different cable for my newer phone — not obvious at first." — reflects an edge-case pattern.
Who should avoid this

- Travel creators — if you need consistent hands-free tracking while moving, avoid this kit because tracking loss is common.
- Interviewers — if uninterrupted audio is critical, avoid this kit due to recurring mic dropouts and pairing quirks.
- Large-phone users — if you use larger phones, avoid this kit unless you accept extra adapters and fiddling.
Who this is actually good for

- Beginners on a budget — okay if you accept occasional tracking errors and plan to edit around short failures.
- Static tabletop creators — fine for static, seated streaming where tracking and range stress are low.
- Short test shoots — workable for short clips where audio is monitored and re-takes are acceptable.
Expectation vs reality

Expectation (reasonable for this category): face-tracking should follow slow movement reliably.
Reality: tracking commonly drops during normal turns and requires re-centering, making many takes unusable.
Expectation: included wireless mics should pair and stay connected for interviews.
Reality: pairing is often flaky and range can be less than advertised without a wired backup.
Safer alternatives

- Choose kits with proven tracking algorithms or a physical gimbal to neutralize tracking failures.
- Prefer wired mic options or kits offering a wired fallback to avoid wireless dropouts.
- Look for sturdier tripods with heavier bases if long-extension stability is a must.
- Buy with adapters or verify connector support for your phone to avoid hidden cable needs.
The bottom line

Main regret trigger: unreliable face-tracking combined with flaky audio makes key footage unusable.
Verdict: this kit is cheaper but carries a higher-than-normal risk for creators who need dependable hands-free tracking and steady audio; avoid if reliability matters.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

