Product evaluated: Gillette Fusion5 Mens Razor Blade Refills, 12 Count, Lubrastrip for a More Comfortable Shave
Related Videos For You
Gillette: How to Clean and Maintain Razors
25 Razor Blades durability tested
Data basis: This report synthesized feedback from hundreds of written reviews and video demonstrations collected between 2011 and 2025, with most feedback from written reviews and supported by video clips.
| Buyer outcome | Gillette Fusion5 (this) | Typical mid-range cartridge |
|---|---|---|
| Blade longevity | Shorter life — commonly reported dulling after fewer shaves. | Average life — lasts through expected cartridge cycles. |
| Skin comfort | Mixed results — irritation appears repeatedly for sensitive users. | More forgiving — mid-range alternatives show fewer irritation reports. |
| Value per blade | Higher cost — price per count feels steep when blades wear fast. | Better value — alternatives often deliver similar performance at lower recurring cost. |
| Fit & compatibility | Generally compatible — fits standard handles but exceptions noted. | Standard fit — similar compatibility with fewer reported issues. |
| Regret trigger | Frequent replacement — most buyers regret repeat purchases due to short life. | Lower regret — fewer repeat purchases needed. |
Top failures

Why do blades seem to dull so quickly?
Regret moment: Many buyers report the blades dull after only a few shaves, making shaving longer and less smooth.
Pattern: This problem is commonly reported and appears repeatedly in written feedback and demo videos.
When it shows up: Dulling usually appears after several uses or within days for daily shavers, and worsens with coarse stubble.
Why worse than normal: Typical mid-range cartridges deliver more shaves before dulling, so this product creates a higher replacement cost than expected for the category.
Are skin nicks and irritation more likely?
- Early sign: tugging or scratching during the second pass.
- Frequency tier: secondary issue — not universal but repeatedly mentioned by sensitive-skin buyers.
- Cause: blade dulling and aggressive technique increase cut and razor burn risk.
- Impact: short-term irritation that requires extra soothing or skipped days between shaves.
- Attempted fixes: more shaving cream and gentler strokes, which add time and effort.
Does the lubrastrip fader signal reliability matter?
- Indicator issue: lubrastrip fades inconsistently, causing confusion about blade readiness.
- Usage anchor: Problem appears during regular use when buyers expected a clear visual cue.
- Frequency: persistent for a notable subset of reviews, though not universal.
- Why worse: Mid-range alternatives often have clearer wear signals, so this increases uncertainty and wasted shaves.
- Hidden requirement: extra inspection of blades before each shave to avoid poor shaves.
- Fixability: manual checks help but add time and reduce convenience.
- Long-term cost: more frequent swaps raise recurring expenses.
Do buyers regret the price-to-performance tradeoff?
- Value complaint: cost per blade feels high when blades need replacing sooner than expected.
- Scope signal: appears repeatedly across recent purchaser feedback, not just isolated posts.
- Condition that worsens: daily shaves or coarse hair accelerate perceived poor value.
- Impact on routine: higher recurring spend or switching brands mid-subscription.
- Attempts: sharpening hacks or limiting passes, which reduce shave quality.
- Comparative pain: more expensive than mid-range choices when factoring in replacement frequency.
- Fixability: minimal without changing the cartridge or shaving habits.
- Hidden need: better pre-shave prep to stretch blade life, adding time and products.
Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)

Excerpt: "Blades felt dull after three shaves, had to press harder." — primary pattern
Excerpt: "Lubrastrip turned white but razor still tugged on beard." — secondary pattern
Excerpt: "I switched after one month because cost was too high." — primary pattern
Excerpt: "Needed more shaving gel to avoid burns, extra time every morning." — secondary pattern
Who should avoid this

- Daily shavers who need long-lasting blades and want low recurring cost.
- Sensitive skin users who cannot tolerate extra irritation or frequent nicks.
- Value shoppers who expect mid-range cartridge lifespan before replacement.
Who this is actually good for

- Occasional shavers who shave infrequently and can tolerate shorter blade life.
- Brand-loyal users who prioritize handle compatibility and are willing to accept extra cost.
- Shavers wanting precision for tricky spots who value the trimmer despite other trade-offs.
Expectation vs reality

- Expectation: Reasonable for this category is several comfortable shaves per cartridge.
- Reality: Buyers report faster dulling and more irritation than that reasonable baseline.
- Expectation: Lubrastrip reliably signals blade life.
- Reality: The strip can be inconsistent, so visual cues are unreliable.
Safer alternatives

- Try thicker-gauge cartridges — look for mid-range brands known for longer life to reduce replacement frequency.
- Choose sensitive-skin variants — pick blades marketed and tested for irritation reduction to counter comfort failures.
- Check value packs — buy larger multi-packs that lower per-blade cost if you expect frequent swaps.
- Inspect before use — a quick blade check neutralizes lubrastrip uncertainty and avoids a bad shave.
The bottom line

Main regret: Buyers commonly report blades dulling quickly, which raises ongoing cost and increases irritation risk.
Why it matters: This exceeds normal category risk because mid-range alternatives typically give more shaves before replacement.
Verdict: Avoid if you shave daily or prioritize long blade life and low recurring cost.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

