Product evaluated: GRAINGER APPROVED Delineator Post, Yellow, 36" H x 3" Dia., Plastic Base, Polyurethane Delineator, No Retroreflective Collar, 3.5 lb, 4 Base Bolt Holes
Related Videos For You
Traffic Cylinder & Delineator Base Installation Guide
Pexco's FG 300 Channelizer Posts
Data basis: This report is based on dozens of written reviews and multiple video demonstrations collected between Jan 2020 and Feb 2026. Most feedback came from written reviews, supported by product videos and buyer Q&A. The sample is weighted toward recent buyers and installers.
| Outcome | This product | Typical mid-range alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Stability in wind | Higher risk — lightweight base often tips under moderate wind or minor impacts. | Lower risk — mid-range posts use heavier bases or integrated ballast. |
| Night visibility | Deficient — no retroreflective collar included, reducing nighttime visibility unless modified. | Standard — most alternatives include reflective collars or strips out of the box. |
| Installation friction | Hidden steps — base holes present but hardware often not supplied, adding time and parts cost. | User-friendly — many mid-range units include fastening hardware or clear kit lists. |
| Durability over time | Mixed — surface wear and base damage reported earlier than expected for this category. | Typical — alternatives often show longer life under similar conditions. |
| Regret trigger | Primary — tipping and low visibility combine to create safety and replacement costs. | Less likely — alternatives reduce regret with sturdier bases and built-in reflectivity. |
Will this tip over in wind or when bumped?
Regret moment: Buyers report the post leaning or falling after light impacts or moderate wind, creating safety hazards and repeat replacements.
Pattern: This is a primary issue, commonly reported by installers during first few uses and worsens in exposed outdoor conditions. It feels worse than typical because most mid-range channelizers use heavier bases or ballast, reducing nuisance replacements.
Is it visible enough at night without extra parts?
- Primary visibility gap: No retroreflective collar included, so visibility at night relies on external add-ons.
- When it appears: Noticeable during first night installation or unlit job sites.
- Frequency tier: Secondary issue — frequently mentioned by nighttime installers and parking lot users.
- Why worse: Most competitors include reflectivity, so this omission forces extra purchases and labor.
Do I need extra hardware or hidden tools?
- Hidden requirement: Base shows four bolt holes but hardware is commonly not included, so buyers must source bolts and anchors.
- When it matters: During first installation on asphalt, concrete, or temporary mounts where anchors differ.
- Cause signal: Multiple buyers noted extra trips to hardware stores and added installation time.
- Impact: Installation time and total cost increase compared with products that include a full kit.
- Fixability: Workable but adds steps and sometimes special anchors for different surfaces.
- Category contrast: More installation friction than mid-range alternatives that ship with fasteners.
Will it hold up under repeated outdoor use?
- Early signs: Surface scuffs, base cracking, and post leaning show up after repeated handling and weeks outdoors.
- Frequency tier: Secondary but persistent — several users report wear sooner than expected for similar-priced items.
- Worsening conditions: UV exposure, frequent vehicle contact, and freeze-thaw cycles accelerate damage.
- Visible cause: Lightweight construction and thin base walls appear more prone to damage under repeated stress.
- Attempts to fix: Buyers often add reinforcement, replacement collars, or swap to sturdier posts.
- Repair cost: Repairs or replacements can exceed the expected maintenance for this category.
- Why this hurts: More downtime and replacement expense than typical mid-range channelizers.
Illustrative excerpts
"Fell over in light wind after first day on site." — illustrative; reflects a primary pattern.
"No reflective band included; had to buy extras." — illustrative; reflects a secondary pattern.
"Had to run to hardware store for anchors." — illustrative; reflects an edge-case pattern.
Who should avoid this
- Exposed locations: Avoid if you need posts for windy or high-traffic outdoor sites; tipping risk exceeds normal tolerance.
- Night operations: Avoid if you require plug-and-play night visibility; the missing reflector increases cost and effort.
- Quick installs: Avoid if you want a fully-kitted product; hidden fastener needs add time and planning.
Who this is actually good for
- Low-risk zones: Suitable for calm, low-traffic areas where occasional repositioning is acceptable and tipping is less likely.
- Budget retrofits: Good for buyers willing to add their own reflectors and hardware to save on initial price.
- Short-term use: Works for temporary, short-duration events where long-term durability is not required.
Expectation vs reality
Expectation: Reasonable for this category to arrive ready for use at night. Reality: This unit lacks a reflective collar, requiring immediate modification.
Expectation: Posts of this size usually stand in moderate wind. Reality: Lightweight base leads to tipping and faster wear, increasing replacements and downtime.
Safer alternatives
- Choose heavier bases: Look for posts with integrated ballast or wider/heavier bases to neutralize the tipping issue.
- Buy kits: Prefer products that include reflective collars and fastening hardware to avoid hidden extra costs.
- Plan for anchors: If using this product, pre-purchase anchors and bolts sized to your surface to avoid installation delays.
- Consider UV-rated options: For long outdoor use, choose posts marketed for UV resistance to limit premature cracking.
The bottom line
Main regret: The combined risk of instability and missing reflectivity creates extra cost and safety exposure compared with typical mid-range channelizers.
Verdict: Avoid this post if you need reliable night visibility or durable, wind-resistant channelizers without added parts and effort.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

