Product evaluated: 60692, Upgraded 38k 2-5/16 in Hitch Ball Puck System Gooseneck Hitch Kit with Case for Ford F250/F350/F450, Chevrolet Silverado 2500/3500 HD, GMC Sierra 2500/3500 HD Nissan Titan XD
Related Videos For You
How to hook up a gooseneck trailer
PUCK System - Gooseneck Ball Install in the GMC Sierra 3500
Data basis: This report draws on dozens of written reviews and several video demonstrations collected between 2023 and 2025, with most feedback coming from written posts supported by a smaller set of videos.
| Feature | Lrichy 60692 | Typical mid-range alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Installation friction | Higher — users report extra alignment and fit steps beyond OE fitment. | Lower — most mid-range kits fit with standard puck prep. |
| Compatibility risk | Elevated — requires specific puck systems; hidden requirement for some trucks. | Standard — many alternatives list clear vehicle-specific fitment and adapters. |
| Durability | Mixed — some reports of finish wear or loosening over time. | More consistent — typical mid-range shows fewer early-failure reports. |
| Value | Questionable — extra time and possible returns raise real cost. | Better — fewer returns and less rework expected. |
| Regret trigger | Compatibility/installation — hidden puck needs and fit friction are the biggest regret drivers. | Clear fitment — fewer surprises for buyers who match part numbers. |
Why did my truck not accept the ball?
Compatibility complaints are among the most common issues buyers report.
Pattern: recurring across buyers who believed it was a direct OE swap.
Usage anchor: appears immediately at first installation when puck engagement is attempted.
Category contrast: more disruptive than typical because many mid-range kits clearly note adapter needs.
Why is alignment and install harder than expected?
- Early sign: ball won't seat cleanly or requires shimming during first fit attempt.
- Frequency tier: primary complaint among installation-related feedback.
- Cause: puck hole tolerances and ball height mismatch reported repeatedly.
- Impact: adds extra bench time and may need tools not listed in product notes.
- Attempted fixes: users commonly fabricate shims or return for replacements.
Will the finish and hardware last under towing use?
- Pattern: mixed durability reports are a persistent secondary issue.
- Usage anchor: problems surface after several towing trips or in corrosive environments.
- Signs: flaking finish, loosening anchors, or visible wear on the ball surface.
- Why worse: in this category buyers expect rugged hardware; early wear is more frustrating than usual.
- Impact on use: increases maintenance checks and may require replacement sooner than alternatives.
- Fixability: patching cosmetic finish is possible, but structural wear needs replacement.
- Hidden factor: storage without the rubber cover reported to accelerate corrosion.
Are parts, packaging, or QC reliable enough?
- Pattern: less frequent but notable reports of missing small parts and damaged cases.
- Early sign: missing anchors or loose hardware found at unboxing.
- Frequency tier: secondary to primary compatibility complaints, yet disruptive.
- Cause: inconsistent packing or poor case protection during shipping.
- Impact: adds return steps, delays installation, and harms confidence in the kit.
- Attempted fixes: customers request replacements or buy missing pieces locally.
- Hidden requirement: some trucks require specific puck adapters not included with kit.
- Fixability: solvable but costs time and may nullify the kit's value proposition.
Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)
"Ball wouldn't seat; puck hole misaligned on arrival." — reflects a primary compatibility pattern.
"Finish chipped after two tows in salt air." — reflects a secondary durability pattern.
"Missing safety anchor bolt out of the case." — reflects an edge-case packing issue.
Who should avoid this

- Non-technical buyers who expect plug-and-play OE swapping without puck checks should avoid this kit.
- Frequent haulers who need proven long-term durability and low upkeep should avoid riskier options.
- Buyers without tools who cannot shim or adapt for fitment should avoid kits that may need modifications.
Who this is actually good for

- Mechanically capable owners who accept minor fitting or shimming to save money can tolerate the kit's quirks.
- Occasional tow users who will inspect and maintain the hardware and accept some finish wear.
- Those with puck-ready trucks who verify compatibility first will avoid the primary regret trigger.
Expectation vs reality

Expectation: reasonable for this category is a near-OE fit and straightforward install.
Reality: buyers often face extra alignment work, hidden adapter needs, and earlier-than-expected wear.
Expectation: a sturdy case and complete hardware out of box is normal.
Reality: some kits arrive with loose or missing small parts, adding returns or trips to the store.
Safer alternatives

- Confirm puck type with your dealer or manual before buying to eliminate the core compatibility risk.
- Buy from sellers that list vehicle-specific fitment and include adapters to avoid hidden requirements.
- Prefer verified reviews showing the kit installed on the same truck model to reduce install surprises.
- Choose kits with stronger packing and documented QC if missing parts and damage worry you.
- Budget for tools and possible shims if you are not buying an OEM-branded solution.
The bottom line

Main regret: the biggest trigger is unexpected compatibility and installation friction at first use.
Why it matters: this exceeds normal category risk because it often adds returns, extra tools, or adapters that raise real cost.
Verdict: avoid if you want a guaranteed plug-and-play OE swap; consider it only if you can confirm puck fitment and accept possible rework.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

