Product evaluated: M500 Megohmmeter for Insulation Testing,Compatible with Supco M500 Electronic Megohmmeter up to 1000 Megohms
Related Videos For You
How to Measure Insulation Resistance With The Fluke 1587
How to use a Megger to Identify a Faulty Component
Data We analyzed dozens of buyer notes and demonstrations collected between Jan 2024 and Jan 2026. Most feedback came from written reviews, supported by some video demonstrations. The signals below summarize recurring buyer-visible problems across those sources.
| Outcome | M500 Megohmmeter | Typical mid-range alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement consistency | Inconsistent readings reported repeatedly, making diagnosis slower. | Stable readings are the usual expectation for this category. |
| Ready-to-use | Battery missing from the box creates an immediate extra step. | Includes battery or clearly ships ready to use. |
| Durability risk | Wear and fit complaints appear repeatedly after routine field use. | More robust housings and leads are common in mid-range models. |
| Usability | Interface confusion slows setup for non-experts. | Simpler UI and clearer markings are typical alternatives. |
| Regret trigger | False confidence from unpredictable readings and missing battery. | Lower risk because readings and readiness match expectations. |
Top failures

Why are my readings inconsistent during checks?
Accuracy Buyers frequently flag inconsistent or fluctuating readings as the most disruptive issue. This is a primary issue that appears repeatedly in written reports and demonstrations.
When The problem shows up during the first few tests and often during repeated checks on motors or compressors. It worsens with longer sessions and when comparing against a trusted meter.
Category contrast In this category, mid-range testers usually give repeatable numbers, so this product's variability is more disruptive than expected.
How tricky is setup and daily use?
- Early sign Confusing scale and LED indicators slow first-time setup for many buyers.
- Pattern This is a secondary issue that appears across written feedback and demo videos.
- Usage Shows up immediately after unboxing and during routine troubleshooting of HVAC units.
- Impact Adds extra time to each test and raises the chance of operator error.
- Fix attempts Buyers try reading the manual or comparing to another tool, with mixed success.
Why does the unit feel fragile after regular use?
- Wear Complaints about casing and lead storage appear repeatedly after weeks of field handling.
- Scope This is a secondary trend seen across multiple user reports and unboxing demos.
- When The issue worsens with daily handling, transport, and frequent lead use.
- Cause Reported stress points include the detachable rear panel and lead anchoring.
- Impact Leads and storage fitment failures force extra replacements or repairs.
- Fixability Some buyers jury-rig foam or aftermarket cases to help, but that adds time and cost.
- Category contrast Most mid-range testers have sturdier storage and fewer post-purchase fixes.
What hidden steps surprise buyers out of the box?
- Missing item The product does not include the battery, which many buyers did not expect.
- Pattern This is a primary complaint that appears repeatedly in buyer notes.
- When The friction becomes apparent immediately on first use at the job site.
- Impact Causes unexpected delays and an extra purchase before the tester is usable.
- Hidden requirement You must buy the correct battery size separately to make the unit operational.
- Category contrast Most competitors either include a battery or state the omission clearly, so this omission is more consequential than normal.
- Fix Some buyers keep spare batteries on hand, but that defeats the convenience of a tool meant for quick checks.
Illustrative excerpts
Excerpt "Readings jump between tests and don't match my calibrated meter." — primary pattern
Excerpt "No battery in box; had to stop work to buy one." — primary pattern
Excerpt "LED scale is hard to read under shop lighting." — secondary pattern
Who should avoid this

- Field techs who need consistent readings for diagnostics should avoid this unit.
- Buyers needing ready use should avoid if you can't tolerate a missing battery and delays.
- Heavy users who expect ruggedness should avoid due to wear complaints after routine handling.
Who this is actually good for

- Occasional DIYers who need a cheap tester and can tolerate extra setup and intermittent accuracy.
- Budget-conscious buyers who are willing to accept fixes and spares for lower price.
- Hobbyists comparing rough values where precision is not critical.
Expectation vs reality

- Expectation Reasonable for this category: a tester arrives ready and gives repeatable readings. Reality This unit commonly arrives without a battery and can give inconsistent numbers.
- Expectation Mid-range testers survive routine transport. Reality Several users report fit and storage wear after weeks of field use.
Safer alternatives

- Pick models that include battery to avoid the hidden setup delay and immediate extra purchase.
- Choose well-reviewed mid-range brands with consistent reading reports to reduce diagnostic uncertainty.
- Look for reinforced storage or cases if you’ll carry the tester daily to avoid post-purchase fixes.
- Compare demo tests in video content to confirm repeatability before buying.
The bottom line

Regret trigger The main regret is unpredictable readings combined with a missing battery. This combination creates both a reliability and readiness problem buyers notice immediately.
Verdict For people who need dependable, ready-to-use insulation testing, this product poses a higher-than-normal category risk and is best avoided.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

