Product evaluated: Remington Smooth & Silky Body & Bikini Kit, Cordless bikini trimmer and shaver for women, Waterproof for grooming in the shower, White/Green
Related Videos For You
More, less or no hair…down there, the Philips Bikini Trimmer
How To Maintain Hair Clippers | Save $$$ by Stripping and Cleaning
Dozens of buyer comments were aggregated for this report from written reviews and video demonstrations, collected from the product release in May 2017 through January 2026. Most feedback came from written reviews, supported by hands-on video content and trimmed buyer Q&A notes.
| Outcome | Remington kit | Typical mid-range trimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Durability | Higher failure risk with motor or head problems reported over months of use. | Expected life is longer with replaceable heads and sturdier motors. |
| Battery/power | Inconsistent cordless power and frequent battery swaps reported during regular use. | Steadier runtime or rechargeable options in mid-range models. |
| Comfort | Tugging and skin irritation appear more often during delicate trimming. | Smoother foils and heads reduce tugging for comparable models. |
| Waterproof reliability | Sealing issues reported when used frequently in-shower or cleaned often. | Stronger sealing or explicit drying steps on mid-range alternatives. |
| Regret trigger | Durability and battery failures produce the most buyer regret. | Less regret where longevity and power delivery are prioritized. |
Top failures

Will this stop working after a few weeks?
Motor failure is the most disruptive regret moment buyers report, often when the unit won’t spin or trims unevenly. This pattern is a primary issue that appears repeatedly across feedback.
When it shows up: the fault commonly appears after repeated weekly use or a few months of ownership, not always on first use. This is worse than typical because many mid-range kits last significantly longer under similar routines.
Does the battery die too fast or lose power?
- Pattern Inconsistent cordless power is a secondary issue that appears repeatedly for regular users.
- When It happens during daily or multi-area sessions and after months of ownership.
- Cause Uses one AA cell; buyers report frequent replacements or weak performance compared to rechargeable alternatives.
- Impact Interrupts grooming and adds ongoing battery cost and hassle.
Will it pull hair or irritate sensitive skin?
- Early sign Mild tugging or uneven trim on first few passes is commonly reported.
- Frequency This is a secondary issue seen across many user reports, especially for delicate bikini-area use.
- Usage It worsens with longer sessions and when trimming against grain or using dull heads.
- Cause Foil and blade alignment feels less forgiving than typical mid-range heads.
- Impact Leads to redness or missed spots, adding extra time to finish grooming.
- Fixability Some buyers temporarily improve results with very light passes or oil, but the underlying feel often returns.
Is shower use and cleaning really hassle-free?
- Hidden requirement Regular drying and careful reassembly are needed after wet use to avoid performance decline.
- Pattern Waterproof claims are an edge-case complaint that appears when buyers use the unit frequently in-shower.
- When Problems emerge after repeated wet cleaning or long, hot showers that stress seals.
- Cause Water intrusion or trapped moisture can accelerate corrosion or motor wear.
- Impact Leads to decreased runtime and eventual motor issues; more upkeep than expected for this price tier.
- Attempts Buyers report drying and storing upright helps short-term but doesn’t prevent long-term decline.
- Requirement Expect to add drying time and periodic part replacement to maintain function.
Illustrative excerpts
Excerpt: "Stopped working after a few months of regular use, motor just died." — Primary pattern.
Excerpt: "Battery felt weak mid-session, had to swap AA every week." — Secondary pattern.
Excerpt: "Used in shower; then it started making noise and cutting poorly." — Edge-case pattern.
Who should avoid this

- Frequent users who need daily or multiple-area grooming, because durability issues exceed normal category tolerance.
- Shower groomers who plan heavy wet use, due to sealing and maintenance needs that add time and risk.
- Those needing steady power for longer sessions, because AA reliance can interrupt routines.
Who this is actually good for

- Infrequent trimmers who groom occasionally and accept shorter lifespan for a lower price.
- Battery-tolerant users who prefer replaceable AA cells and don’t mind swapping batteries.
- Budget shoppers wanting basic wet/dry features and who will dry and maintain the tool after shower use.
Expectation vs reality

Expectation: Buyers reasonably expect multi-month reliability for a mid-range body trimmer.
Reality: This kit shows higher-than-normal wear and battery inconsistency, causing earlier replacement or extra upkeep.
Safer alternatives

- Choose rechargeable models to neutralize battery inconsistency and avoid frequent AA replacements.
- Pick trimmers with replaceable heads to reduce downtime from blade wear and extend usable life.
- Favor sealed designs with explicit drying instructions to reduce the risk from repeated in-shower use.
- Read warranty details and prefer longer coverage for motor or water-damage protection.
The bottom line

Main regret centers on durability and inconsistent cordless power that interrupt grooming routines.
Why it matters This exceeds normal category risk because similar mid-range trimmers typically last longer with fewer battery hassles.
Verdict Avoid this model if you expect frequent use, regular in-shower grooming, or steady battery performance.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

