Product evaluated: Shure SM57 Professional XLR Dynamic Microphone – Cardioid Mic for Instruments, Amplifiers, Drums & Live Performance Recording (SM57-LC)
Related Videos For You
How to Set Up the Shure SM7b for Beginners (FAQ Series)
Microphones Are Nasty! This is How to Clean/Sanitize Them | Shure
Data basis Dozens of written reviews and video demonstrations were reviewed between Jan 2020 and Dec 2025, with most feedback coming from written reviews supported by hands-on clips.
| Outcome | Shure SM57 | Typical Mid‑Range Mic |
|---|---|---|
| Gain requirement | High — commonly reported need for extra preamp gain for quiet sources. | Moderate — most mid-range models come up hotter from similar sources. |
| Handling noise | Noticeable — persistent complaints about physical noise during play. | Lower — many peers include better internal damping. |
| Stage bleed | Good — cardioid pattern isolates well on loud stages. | Similar — typical cardioid competition performs similarly. |
| Setup friction | Higher — extra preamp/placement often required to reduce noise. | Lower — many mid-range choices aim for plug‑and‑play ease. |
| Regret trigger | Low output + handling noise — forces extra gear and time. | Less likely — typical alternatives need less compensation. |
Top failures
Why does this mic feel too quiet for some instruments?
Regret moment You point the mic and get a low level that forces you to crank the preamp.
Pattern This is commonly reported by buyers using quieter acoustic sources and brass.
Category contrast The result is worse than typical mid-range mics because it requires more gain and careful placement to match stage volume.
Why is handling noise a constant problem?
- Early sign Handling thumps and stand rattle appear during first use with handheld or loosely mounted setups.
- Frequency This complaint is persistent across written and video feedback.
- Cause Physical shocks transfer into the capsule and become audible at standard gain settings.
- Impact Handling noise is more disruptive than expected for this category when you need quiet takes.
- Fix attempts Users report needing aftermarket shock mounts or different clips to reduce the noise.
Why does setup take longer than it should?
- Hidden requirement Extra preamp gain or inline boosters are often required for low-output sources.
- Usage anchor This appears during initial sessions when mic is used with interfaces that have weak preamps.
- Pattern This setup friction is seen across multiple feedback sources, not just a one-off.
- Category contrast More time is needed than with typical mid-range dynamic mics, which often accept lower-gain inputs.
- Attempted fixes Buyers plug into dedicated preamps, which adds cost and bulk.
- Residual risk Even after boosting gain, handling noise can persist and still require physical damping.
Why do some buyers feel the mic causes more workflow friction on stage and in studio?
- First use Quick swaps during gigs can expose placement sensitivity and uneven levels.
- Frequency tier This is a secondary but common complaint for session players and engineers.
- Cause The microphone’s narrow sweet spot demands tighter aiming than many expect.
- Impact Vocalists or brass players notice tonal jumps when moving a few inches.
- Attempted fixes Engineers reposition and EQ more often, which adds mixing time.
- Fixability Improvements are possible, but require time, skill, and extra gear like preamps or mounts.
- Edge-case Users in very quiet studios report less problem but still flag the gain need.
- Outcome For quick, plug-and-play rigs this mic raises the time and cost barrier.
Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)
Excerpt "Mic barely registers my acoustic guitar without a preamp boost." — primary
Excerpt "Handling thumps show up on every take unless I use a mount." — secondary
Excerpt "Worked fine on drums but was fussy for quiet vocal passages." — edge-case
Who should avoid this
- Low-gain rigs Avoid if your audio interface has weak preamps and you can’t add gain.
- Quick-swap gigs Avoid if you need fast mic swaps without retuning levels on stage.
- Quiet studio vocalists Avoid if you record delicate vocals and expect plug‑and‑play quiet takes.
Who this is actually good for
- Stage loud instruments Good for loud guitar amps and snare drums where gain and handling noise matter less.
- Users with preamps Good for buyers who already own high-gain preamps or inline boosters.
- Engineers who EQ Good for engineers willing to spend time on placement and EQ to tame quirks.
Expectation vs reality
Expectation Reasonable for this category: a rugged dynamic mic will be easy to use live.
Reality The mic often needs extra gain and damping, which creates more setup time than similar mid-range competitors.
Expectation Reasonable for this category: cardioid pattern isolates well on stage.
Reality While isolation is solid, low output and handling noise make it less friendly for quiet sources than expected.
Safer alternatives
- Choose hotter microphones Pick dynamics that advertise higher output to avoid extra preamps.
- Look for internal damping Prioritize mics with built-in shock isolation to reduce handling thumps.
- Confirm preamp gain Match your mic choice to your interface’s preamp headroom before buying.
- Test before gig If possible, trial the mic with your stage rig to see real gain and noise behavior.
The bottom line
Main regret The primary trigger is low output plus handling noise, which forces added gear and time.
Why worse This combination exceeds normal category risk because many mid-range mics need less compensation.
Verdict Avoid if you want plug‑and‑play quiet recording or you lack a strong preamp; consider it only if you accept extra setup and gear.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.