Product evaluated: Smead End Tab File Folder, Straight-Cut Tab, Letter Size, Manila, 100 per Box (24100)
Related Videos For You
This Simple File Management System Changed My Life!
Real Fire Test of DocSafe Fireproof Document Bag/File Folder
Data basis I analyzed dozens of buyer reports collected between April 2023 and February 2026. Sources included written reviews, user photos, and video demonstrations. Distribution most feedback came from written reviews, supported by photos and a few demo videos.
| Outcome | Smead (this product) | Typical mid-range folder |
|---|---|---|
| Durability | Noticeable wear appears repeatedly under daily handling and heavier stacks. | More robust survives regular office use longer before tearing. |
| Tab consistency | Variable alignment causes mislabeling and overlapping tabs for some boxes. | Predictable tabs line up more reliably for labeling systems. |
| Packaging accuracy | Mixed quality boxes sometimes contain weaker or odd-cut folders. | More uniform boxes match advertised feel and cut more often. |
| Replacement frequency | Higher risk of needing earlier replacement when used daily. | Lower risk of early replacement for similar mid-range options. |
| Regret trigger | Frequent rework such as relabeling or replacing torn folders. | Stable filing fewer mid-range folders need immediate fixes. |
Top failures

Are the tabs misaligned or inconsistent?
Regret moment You open a fresh box and labels don't line up across files. Severity This makes alphabetical or indexed filing take extra time and look messy.
Pattern This issue appears repeatedly across the feedback rather than being a one-off problem. When it shows up it is usually on first use when you try to label several folders. Category contrast Mid-range folders usually have more consistent tab placement, so this feels worse than expected.
Do folders tear or wear out faster than expected?
- Early signs Some buyers reported edges that split after frequent flipping.
- Frequency tier This is a primary issue and appears commonly for daily users.
- Usage context It gets worse with heavy stacks and constant handling over weeks.
- Cause Reported causes point to thinner-than-expected stock and stress at tab seams.
- Impact Tearing raises replacement time and increases supply costs.
Is paper thickness and cut inconsistent box-to-box?
- Manufacturing variance Feedback shows inconsistent weight and cut quality across boxes.
- How it appears You may see bowed or uneven folders when stacking immediately out of the box.
- Frequency tier This is a secondary problem but reported often enough to notice.
- Worsens The issue appears mostly when mixing folders from multiple boxes.
- Category contrast Typical mid-range folders are more uniform, so this increases sorting work.
- Fixability Buyers commonly solve it by re-sorting or discarding the worst pieces.
Are there hidden steps required to make these usable?
- Hidden requirement Several buyers must reinforce tabs or add protective sleeves before heavy use.
- Early signs Tabs crease or bend when first labeled or handled.
- Frequency tier This is a common secondary pattern for active filing systems.
- When the extra steps show up during setup for projects or moving large volumes.
- Impact Extra prep time adds labor and slowdowns for office teams.
- Attempts Reported fixes include using clear reinforcements or switching to tab protectors.
- Category contrast Most mid-range folders rarely require pre-reinforcement, so this is more work than expected.
- Hidden cost The need for extra materials can erase the product's low-cost edge.
Illustrative excerpts

Illustrative "Tabs don't line up so labels overlap across folders." — primary pattern.
Illustrative "Edges started to split after a few weeks of daily flipping." — primary pattern.
Illustrative "Some folders in the box felt flimsy while others were okay." — secondary pattern.
Illustrative "I had to add plastic reinforcements before using them for projects." — secondary pattern.
Who should avoid this

- High-volume offices Avoid if you need daily heavy handling and long-lasting folders.
- Precision filers Avoid if aligned tabs and consistent labeling matter to your workflow.
- Teams on tight budgets Avoid if replacement time or extra materials negate the initial savings.
Who this is actually good for

- Light home use Good for occasional filing where tabs and heavy wear are not critical.
- Short-term projects Useful when folders are needed temporarily and low cost matters more than longevity.
- Single-user archives Works if you accept reinforcing tabs and want inexpensive boxes.
Expectation vs reality

- Expectation Reasonable for this category: folders should line up for labeling. Reality Tabs can be inconsistent, requiring rework.
- Expectation Reasonable for this category: a box gives uniform feel. Reality Box-to-box variance can force sorting and rejection.
- Expectation Reasonable for this category: usable out of the box. Reality Some buyers need reinforcements before heavy use.
Safer alternatives
- Buy heavier stock Choose folders labeled as heavier point or reinforced tabs to neutralize tearing.
- Choose uniform brands Pick vendors known for consistent tab placement to avoid misalignment.
- Test one box Buy a single box first to check for cut and weight before bulk purchasing.
- Use tab protectors Add clear plastic tab sleeves to avoid early bending if you still buy this product.
- Return tolerance Prefer sellers with easy returns to swap low-quality boxes quickly.
The bottom line
Main regret The primary trigger is inconsistent tabs and faster wear under daily use. Why worse This exceeds normal category risk because it adds prep time and replacement cost. Verdict Avoid for heavy or precision filing; consider only for light short-term use or when you can accept extra steps.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

