Product evaluated: Tory Burch Women's Miller Patent Thong Sandal, Perfect Black Patent, 8 Medium US
Related Videos For You
Skechers Meditation Embellished Thong Sandals - Glass Daisy on QVC
Start wearing thongs sandals comfortably
Data basis: This report draws on dozens of buyer reviews and product videos gathered from written reviews and demonstration clips collected from 2016 through Feb 2026. Most feedback came from written reviews, supported by video demonstrations, and reflects recent buyer experiences.
| Outcome | Tory Burch Miller Sandal | Typical Mid-range Sandal |
|---|---|---|
| Fit accuracy | Runs small and shows sizing inconsistency compared with peers. | More predictable fit; sizes match size charts more often. |
| Comfort over time | Stiff at first with reported rubbing during long wear. | More forgiving materials that soften sooner with wear. |
| Finish durability | Patent scuffing and visible wear appear sooner than expected. | Moderate wear that often hides minor scuffs longer. |
| Care & break-in | Needs break-in and special care to avoid creasing and marks. | Lower care needs; cleans and breaks in with less fuss. |
| Regret trigger | High—sizing plus stiffness combines to produce buyer returns more often. | Lower—one-off issues are less likely to trigger returns. |
Do these shoes run true to size?
Sizing inconsistency: Many buyers report that the sandal runs small or fits unevenly across sizes, creating surprise at first try-on. This pattern is commonly reported and appears repeatedly across written reviews.
When it shows up: The problem appears at first use when trying on or during the first walk outside; tighter fit worsens after sustained walking. This is more disruptive than typical sandals which often only need brief breaks.
Why it feels worse: Compared with mid-range alternatives, these sandals are less forgiving of sizing variance, which raises return or exchange likelihood and buyer regret.
Will they stay comfortable during long days?
- Early signs: Stiff strap edges cause immediate rubbing for some buyers within the first hour of wear.
- Frequency tier: This is a primary issue for many buyers and commonly reported in written feedback.
- Cause: The sandal requires a break-in period; discomfort is most noticeable during long walks or standing shifts.
- Impact: The discomfort is more disruptive than expected for sandals in this price band because it reduces usable wear-time.
- Attempts to fix: Buyers report using padding or stretch workarounds, which add steps and still may not resolve pressure points.
How durable is the finish and sole?
- Visible wear: Patent finish scuffs and creases show up after repeated use, not just heavy abuse.
- Scope signal: This concern appears across both written reviews and video demonstrations.
- Frequency tier: Considered a secondary issue—less frequent than fit problems but persistent when it occurs.
- Where it worsens: Scuffing is worse in daily use and high-contact surfaces like steps and sidewalks.
- Impact: The cosmetic wear is more noticeable than on comparable sandals, reducing perceived value.
- Fixability: Minor scuffs can be concealed with special cleaners, but that adds maintenance time.
Are special care or hidden steps required?
- Hidden requirement: The sandal often needs break-in and protection to avoid early creasing—this is not obvious at purchase.
- Early sign: Shiny finish shows tiny creases after the first few wears, indicating a care need.
- Frequency tier: This is a secondary to edge-case issue—not everyone reports it, but it matters if you expect low upkeep.
- Why it’s worse: Compared with mid-range sandals, the time and materials for care are higher, adding cost and effort over ownership.
- Attempts: Buyers mention protective sprays and soft cloths as common mitigation steps.
- Impact on returns: The extra care and fit uncertainty together make returns or exchanges more likely than normal.
- Hidden cost: The need for additional products or services increases total ownership effort.
Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)
- Illustrative: "Tighter than expected, had to exchange for a larger size." — primary pattern
- Illustrative: "Strap rubbed my heel after an hour of walking." — primary pattern
- Illustrative: "Patent scuffed on first wear; looks older fast." — secondary pattern
- Illustrative: "Needed special cleaner to hide marks." — edge-case pattern
Who should avoid this

- Those needing reliable fit: Avoid if you require predictable sizing without exchanges, since fit inconsistency is common.
- All-day workers: Avoid if you expect long-day comfort—stiffness and rubbing are frequently disruptive.
- Low-maintenance buyers: Avoid if you dislike extra care; the finish often needs additional maintenance.
Who this is actually good for

- Short-event wearers: Good if you want a stylish sandal for brief outings and can avoid long walks.
- Size-flexible shoppers: Good if you can exchange sizes without friction or have a nearby store.
- Care-aware buyers: Good for those willing to use protective care and expect to maintain a patent finish.
Expectation vs reality

- Expectation (reasonable): Shoppers expect a comfortable fit at full price for a designer sandal.
- Reality: The sandal often needs a break-in and possible size exchange, making the initial ownership experience worse than expected.
Safer alternatives

- Buy known-fit brands: Choose sandals with consistent sizing to avoid exchanges and the primary fit regret.
- Prioritize softer materials: Look for options advertised as soft-lined or cushioned for reliable long-day comfort.
- Matte or textured finishes: Pick non-patent finishes to reduce visible scuffing and finish-care needs.
- Try before buying: Use in-store try-ons to validate fit and immediate comfort, neutralizing the unknown fit risk.
The bottom line

Main regret: The dominant trigger is combined sizing inconsistency and initial stiffness, which increases exchanges and shortens comfortable wear-time.
Why it matters: These problems are more disruptive than typical mid-range sandals and add hidden upkeep and return friction.
Verdict: If you need predictable fit and long-day comfort, avoid this sandal; if you accept exchanges and extra care, it can work.
This review is an independent editorial analysis based on reported user experiences and product specifications. NegReview.com does not sell products.

