ValueBull Lamb Ears Smell and Size Issues Review Buyer Alert

Data basis I analyzed **hundreds** of written reviews and several video demonstrations collected Jan 2020–Jan 2026, with most feedback coming from written reviews and supported by videos; this report focuses on recurring buyer-visible problems and patterns.

Will my dog choke or gag on random pieces?

Regret moment Buyers often notice a bad bite when a thin or brittle piece shatters unexpectedly during chewing.

Pattern This is a commonly reported issue that appears repeatedly during first few chews and over weeks of use, not just once.

Category contrast This feels worse than typical because mid-range chews usually maintain predictable thickness, so the swallowing risk is more disruptive here.

Why does the pack smell strong or go off quickly?

• Early sign many buyers report a pungent smell on opening, which commonly appeared in initial and later written reports.
• Frequency this is a secondary but persistent pattern, seen across multiple feedback sources.
• Cause inconsistent drying/packaging is commonly cited as the likely driver in buyer observations.
• Impact smell forces extra steps like freezing or fast consumption to avoid spoilage during daily use.
• Fixability re-bagging or airtight containers help but add time and cost compared with typical packs.

Are there hidden storage or handling requirements?

• Hidden need many buyers discovered a need to refrigerate or freeze portions to prevent greasiness and odor during long-term storage.
• When it shows the storage issue appears within days in warm or humid homes, not only after weeks.
• Frequency tier this is a primary inconvenience for bulk buyers who keep chews long-term.
• Impact on routine extra steps add handling time and reduce the convenience benefit of buying in bulk.
• Category contrast more upkeep than most mid-range alternatives, which often remain stable without refrigeration.
• Attempts buyers reported portioning into small bags or freezing, which reduces but does not eliminate complaints.

Does the bulk price actually save money given quality trade-offs?

• Value alarm buyers often question the bulk price after encountering variable piece quality and extra storage needs.
• Usage context value problems surface after a few uses when pieces are sorted for size and tossed for smell or brittleness.
• Frequency this is a commonly reported regret among bulk purchasers who expected uniform value.
• Impact wasted pieces or extra storage costs reduce the perceived savings significantly.
• Mitigation attempts re-packaging and selective use cut losses but require time and attention.
• Category contrast less forgiving than typical bulk pet chews that deliver steadier piece quality.
• Hidden cost added time and supplies for preservation make total ownership cost higher than expected.

Illustrative excerpts (not real quotes)

“Opened a bag that smelled sour, had to freeze pieces.” — reflects a primary pattern.

“Half the ears were tiny, one was paper-thin and cracked.” — reflects a primary pattern.

“Needed extra bags and time to sort sizes before giving.” — reflects a secondary pattern.

“Dog loved one piece, refused another — inconsistent.” — reflects an edge-case pattern.

Who should avoid this

• Owners of small or elderly dogs who face higher choking risk from irregular pieces should avoid this bulk pack.
• Buyers who expect low-maintenance bulk because extra storage and re-bagging are commonly required here.
• People sensitive to odor since repeated reports highlight stronger smells on opening and during storage.

Who this is actually good for

• Allergy-prone dogs who need single-ingredient options and whose owners accept extra sorting and storage.
• High-volume chewers who use pieces quickly and therefore avoid long-term storage problems.
• Buyers comfortable with prep work who will sort and repackage immediately to control size and odor.

Expectation vs reality

Expectation Buyers reasonably expect a bulk chew pack to be uniform and low-maintenance for weeks.

Reality Many report variable sizing, stronger odor, and extra storage steps within days, which is worse than category norms.

Expectation Pet chews should pose low choking risk if labeled for general use.

Reality Irregular thickness here raises swallowing concerns, making the product less forgiving than standard mid-range options.

Safer alternatives

• Choose smaller multi-pack options to avoid bulk spoilage and make pieces more predictable for portion control.
• Look for vacuum-sealed packs to neutralize the odor and freshness failures highlighted above.
• Buy pre-cut or standardized chews if choking risk is a main concern, since they offer predictable thickness.
• Split bulk into sealed portions at purchase as a neutralizing step to reduce storage handling and odor spread.

The bottom line

Main regret The primary trigger is bulk inconsistency: variable piece size plus odor and extra storage needs.

Why worse These failures are more disruptive than typical pet chew issues because they add choking risk and ownership work.

Verdict Avoid this product if you need predictable, low-maintenance chews; consider smaller, sealed alternatives instead.